Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Brilliant Investment Thinking by Advisers for Advisers.
ASX
+0.33%
S&P
-0.91%
AUD
$0.69

Compliance

Share
Print

Discovery and documentation the keys to sound compliance

Discovery and documentation the keys to sound compliance
Share
Print

While advisers and their licensees place most of their compliance eggs in the SOA basket, the real focus should remain on more robust client discovery and documentation processes according to Assured Support's Ben Moffatt.

Regulatory scrutiny may have eased up since the froth of the post-Hayne royal commission era, but the settings remain the same, and licensees are still keen to be safe rather than sorry.

So despite ASIC’s repeated exhortations that financial advice documentation is too long and full of unnecessary information, statements of advice are likely largely remain thick and unwieldy (at least without regulatory intervention, which is still in train). Advisers may have moved on from believing that their value proposition needs to be evidenced by a half-inch stack of advice accoutrements, but risk mitigation sits above client experience in the priority spectrum for licensees.

According to compliance experts, however, the real focus for advice teams should be on the upfront period, or discovery process, when the core information relevant to the client is collected and collated and primary drivers are established.

“We believe the most important thing for advisers is that discovery process,” said Assured Support advice manager Ben Moffatt during The Inside Network’s recent INPractice webinar, Documenting your investment process. “This is where the platform is set.”

Without a robust discovery process, Moffatt (pictured) explained, that not only captures all the relevant goals and risk settings for a new client but documents it, the advice delivery model is compromised, as is the compliance framework of the practice. “We often find that when this is done poorly, the advice that follows isn’t usually that great either,” he said. “We always say to advisers, this is where you should be spending the most time with the client.”

Moffatt referenced a 2019 report (R639) ASIC published on financial advice provided by superannuation providers, which revealed that almost a third of non-compliance instances occurred when the advice provider failed to adequately identify the objectives, financial situation and needs of the member.

While many advice groups place a lot of emphasis on the initial fact find, ASIC looks at the discovery process through a different lens, with Section 961B of the Corporations Act requiring advisers to identify the objectives, financial situation needs of the client.

“ASIC’s view is that if you can’t identify the subject matter there will obviously be problems with scoping, and this will lead to inappropriate advice that’s not in the client’s best interest,” Moffatt said. “Again, this just reinforces the point that the discovery process is critical.”

Share
Print

Even long-standing clients can create unexpected AML risk

Many advisers believe long relationships are their best defence against financial crime risk. Under the new AML framework, familiarity is no substitute for...

When ‘low-risk’ isn’t no-risk: the AML/CTF lessons professional advisers can’t ignore

With AML/CTF regulation expanding in 2026, Catherine Evans dismantles the dangerous myths that low-risk clients and good intentions are enough to keep...

Kit Legal launches AML/CTF solution for advice firms

With Tranche 2 drawing closer and institutional counterparties already testing firms’ AML maturity, Kit Legal’s new framework quietly shifts a looming...

Compliance is changing, and it could the biggest growth opportunity yet

If the past year has taught us anything, it’s this: the firms that are winning trust and ultimately market share are treating compliance as strategy, not...