Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Brilliant Investment Thinking by Advisers for Advisers.
ASX
+0.33%
S&P
-1.01%
AUD
$0.69

Analysis

Share
Print

The answer to the Magnificent Seven’s ‘really difficult investment problem’

The answer to the Magnificent Seven’s ‘really difficult investment problem’
Share
Print

A huge benefit has already been realised in the price of the Magnificent Seven and it might be time to take some risk off the table instead of speculating on future fundamentals, according to Lazard.

It’s pretty rare to see the equity market rise 30 per cent in one year, and any investor that’s stayed in the Magnificent Seven stocks (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla) has been richly rewarded.

But that’s almost all on expectations, Lazard global listed infrastructure portfolio manager Warryn Robertson told The Inside Network’s Equities and Growth Symposium – except for Nvidia, which is growing earnings at an astonishing rate.

“But for the other six it’s all in expectations of future earnings because their actual earnings didn’t really do that much; it’s all been multiple rewriting,” Robertson said.

That doesn’t detract from their performance; it’s a “great achievement”, and their investors have been richly rewarded. But now it’s time to make the true investment decision, Robertson said.

“Do you bet on black and roll the dice? Or do you take the expectations of those future earnings at some time in the deep, dark distant future and capitalise that by putting it in something today?”

Generally speaking, the Magnificent Seven have an amazing earnings outlook, but they’re a “really difficult investment problem to solve” – the poster child of which is Tesla.

“I don’t think anybody can tell you what it’s worth in 10 years’ time because I don’t think Elon knows what it’s going to be in 10 years’ time,” Robertson said.  

So investors can try and solve that problem – and potentially get it wrong –  or get paid today by investing in listed infrastructure stocks like National Grid or Transurban, where the variability around their earnings in 10 years’ time is much tighter.

“My job – all day, every day – is to forecast earnings and put a multiple on it and come up with a valuation,”  Robertson said. “If you can find a group of businesses that are much easier to predict the cashflows of you’re more likely to get that valuation problem right.”

“So I’d encourage you to be brave and take some of the profits you’ve made out of the Magnificent Seven and reallocate them into much more surer, short-term cashflow generative assets today where you’re much clearer on what they look like in a decade.”

Share
Print

Reflexivity and the risk of market feedback loops

In periods of expansion, reflexivity supports rising valuations and expanding credit availability; but like leverage, it operates in both directions

Mean reversion: powerful until the regime shifts

Markets often reward patience. Mean reversion has humbled many predictions of a new era. Yet regime shifts do occur. When the base conditions change, the old...

Finding value when momentum runs hot

As AI enthusiasm and speculative behaviour reshape equity markets, John Goetz and Dan Babkes from Pzena Investment Management say advisers should look beyond...

Your brain on red: why the wealth management industry’s crisis playbook is making things worse

The wealth management industry believes market panic is an education problem. In reality, it’s a biology problem.