Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Brilliant Investment Thinking by Advisers for Advisers.
ASX
+0.33%
S&P
-1.05%
AUD
$0.69

Private Debt & Equity

Share
Print

Companies ditch IPO route, opening up new channels for investors

Companies ditch IPO route, opening up new channels for investors
Share
Print

It's a perfect storm: Companies are staying private for longer and finding "myriad" ways to raise capital outside the traditional IPO route, while investors are becoming attracted to the investment opportunities they present.

Many investors in the share market might not know it, but their investment world is rapidly changing before their very eyes. The number of listed companies, always only a tiny fraction of all companies, is contracting. Over the past 25 years the number of publicly listed companies in the US alone has halved from 8,000 to 4,000 – and it’s a global trend. Looking through a different prism, in 2014 there were 42 late-stage venture companies worth more than $US1 billion in the US. Today there are more than 1,000, a massive increase.

It’s not just an issue of less companies wanting to list. It’s also the fact that many companies are deciding to stay private for longer. They have decided the regulatory demands are too onerous and costly and that their high-growth strategies can alienate shareholders focused on earnings and dividends.

It also reflects the reality that the opportunities for private companies to raise capital are more varied so the need to go public to fund early-stage development is not nearly as pressing.

On the other side of the coin, there is no shortage of capital wanting to invest in these established private pre-IPO companies. As is often the case in investment trends, the US market is a bellwether of what is happening with an estimated $US1.5 trillion invested in these companies in the past decade. It has allowed these companies to grow, innovate, and disrupt without having to be concerned about the burdens that come with being publicly listed. 

There are other advantages too. For the founders of these private companies, it gives them more options. For example, by having access to a trading platform and other sources of capital, it relieves the pressure to have a premature IPO. At the same time, it can still allow shareholders to trade their shares. And, by having a wider spread of sophisticated shareholders, it increases the chances of having a successful IPO when the decision to go public is made.

So, in a real sense, what we are seeing is a perfect storm: companies wanting to stay private longer are finding myriad avenues to raise capital outside the traditional IPO route at the very time investors are becoming more aware of and attracted to the investment opportunities these companies offer.

Increasing investor interest is the fact many of these companies are in those investment sweet spots – the industry sectors of tomorrow such as fintech, healthcare, education, security, cloud technology, genomics, and biotechnology.

As investing in private companies moves increasingly into the mainstream, there is one constant with investing in publicly listed companies – the need for due diligence. While pre-IPO buying opportunities are prized because they tend to be attractively priced, they also come with less liquidity and transparency than a publicly listed company. The phrase, ‘high risk, high reward’, is merited. So, with such investments, investors need to be prepared to do their research. This cannot be stressed enough.

One approach is to use a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis – known as a top-down and bottom-up approach – to distinguish companies worth pursuing and those to set aside. When engaging in fundamental analysis, examine:

  • Quality of management
  • Experience and strength of investors
  • Quality of the business and operating model
  • Market opportunity
  • Competitive landscape
  • Capital structure
  • Path to profitability if not yet profitable

This list is far from exhaustive. If physically possible you can visit the company. How are they spending your money – or potential money? Is the car park populated with Ferraris or Toyotas? The latter is preferable. Doing your homework and seeking professional advice, if necessary, is critical.

Share
Print

Discipline in lending: why non-bank property finance is gaining ground

As non-bank lending grows, advisers need to look past yield and focus on risk, governance and track record.

One door to private credit: how multi-manager strategies simplify a complex asset class

Private credit promises yield and diversification, but it also brings complexity, illiquidity and a growing manager universe. For KeyInvest and Atchison, the...

Conflict worsens the picture for levered credit

Leveraging an investment-grade credit portfolio was already a dubious strategy before the Middle East war broke out. It's now an even worse idea, says Yarra...

Liquidity in private credit: separating promise from practice

As private credit allocations grow, so too do questions around liquidity risk. This piece helps advisers look beyond headline redemption terms to understand...