Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Stay informed Sign up for our newsletter and be the first to know.
Brilliant Investment Thinking by Advisers for Advisers.
ASX
+0.33%
S&P
-1.96%
AUD
$0.69

Industry Governance

Share
Print

FPA seeks urgent extension of ASIC levy freeze

FPA seeks urgent extension of ASIC levy freeze
Share
Print

The association is calling for an immediate continuation of ASIC's industry levy relief and a fairer approach to costs for planners.

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has urgently called for ASIC to extend its freeze on the annual industry levy to cover the 2023 financial year.

In a statement issued on Tuesday (23 August), the FPA outlined the potential for big increases in the ASIC fees paid by financial planners for the 2022-23 financial year.

The FPA believes the fee freeze is about to end.

The call comes from the FPA to provide financial planners with some cost certainty for the current income year. The industry body has expressed its concerns practitioners could face a significant rise in their operating costs seeing the levy currently stands at $1,142 per adviser and has not been increased since the 2019 income year.

According to the FPA, time is running out for any changes to the model to be agreed and then implemented in time to impact the current financial year.

“Making financial advice more affordable for all Australians starts with making financial planning more affordable to practice,” FPA chief executive officer Sarah Abood (pictured) said.

“There are activities that we’re aware ASIC undertakes that have nothing to do with financial planners yet are funded by financial planners in the current model. The government has had to intervene twice in the past five years because the model isn’t working as intended.

“It is important that any year-on-year increases better reflect the capacity of the financial planning profession.”

Abood highlights an FPA submission recommending charging the six large licensees at the time (AMP, Macquarie, ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac) directly under a separate and specific levy for the cost of ongoing oversight of their remediation programs and litigation.

“Consideration should be given to excluding these costs from the levy where these matters are ongoing, until the litigation proceedings are complete and the matter has been determined by the court,” she said.

“This will make it clear whether ASIC has achieved a successful outcome in relation to the litigation, and therefore whether costs will or will not be recovered from the entity subject to litigation investigation and proceedings.

Share
Print

The wholesale loophole: same game, different name

While much progress has been made in the professionalism of advice, Jamie Nemtsas argues that the wholesale loophole threatens to unravel the industry.

Compo scheme leaves advisers and their clients in the lurch – again

Every time there’s a financial implosion triggering a claim on the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort, it’s the innocent left picking up the pieces. Even...

Elephant leans on Shield/First Guardian dam wall, cracks it

Macquarie Investment Management has bowed to ASIC pressure and agreed to compensate fully the $321 million in losses its super fund members lost in the...

No more discussion: REs and managed funds must act on ASIC’s compliance-plan review

ASIC has uncovered widespread failings in the compliance frameworks of responsible entities (REs) overseeing nearly $1 trillion in managed funds. Firms have...